News On The Block

 
Home > Lvt

The LVT Bulletin

Decisions from the LVT and Higher Courts summarised and analysed for you 

The LVT Bulletin provides summaries and analysis of important landmark decisions from the LVT, First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and Higher Courts affecting  the residential leasehold property sector. It is a valuable resource for anyone involved in this industry. 

 

Hours of reading and time-consuming research are distilled into a convenient monthly digest with all the facts you need to know, and links to the full pdf decision where available. 

...the easiest way to keep informed about leasehold property case law

 

Key cases are carefully analysed and explained by our specialist legal research team from Arden Chambers and Tanfield Chambers so you can understand the developing law. 

You can view the full masthead by clicking here.

The LVT Bulletin is available only by subscription. Subscribe Now 
 

The LVT Bulletin is supported by:

         

 

Number of Results: 1836

Show All

Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd

Type of Case: Lease Extension

Decision Date: 09/10/2010

Property Address: 73 & 73A Ragstone Road Slough SL1 2NB

Report of the lease extension case Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd, case reference CAM/OOMD/OLR/2010/0079-0081, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 09/10/2010. The case of Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd involved the purchase of a new lease of a residential apartment in Slough under section 48 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 02/12/2010

Property Address: Flats 1 & 2 (and parking space) Ditton Lodge Ditton Court Road Westcliff-on-sea Essex SS0 7HG

Report of the case Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin, case reference CAM/00KF.OLR/2010/0059, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 02/12/2010. The case of Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 25/05/2011

Property Address: 3 Gladstone Court Fairfax Road London NW6 4EP

Report of the case Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate, case reference LON/00AG/OLR/2010/1065, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 25/05/2011. The case of Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 25/05/2011

Property Address: 6 Ribblesdale Road London N8 7EP

Report of the case Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited, case reference LON/00AP/OC9/2011/0020, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 25/05/2011. The case of Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited

Type of Case: Enfranchisement

Decision Date: 23/05/2011

Property Address: 82 Portland Place London W1

Report of the enfranchisement case Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited, case reference PJ/LON/00BK/0CE/2010/0024, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 23/05/2011. The case of Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited involved the purchase of the freehold interest in a residential apartment in London under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 23/05/2011

Property Address: 23 Marmora Road London SE22 0RX

Report of the case Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton , case reference LON/00BE/OC9/2011/0017, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 23/05/2011. The case of Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Lewis and Marquet, Orberst, Pirret v Anand

Type of Case: Enfranchisement

Decision Date: 27/05/2011

Property Address: 3 Kinnoul Road London W6 8NG

Report of the enfranchisement case Lewis and Marquet, Orberst, Pirret v Anand, case reference LON/OOAN/OCE/2011/0001, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 27/05/2011. The case of Lewis and Marquet, Orberst, Pirret v Anandinvolved the purchase of the freehold interest in a residential apartment in London under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Burchell v Raj Properties Limited

Type of Case: Lease Extension

Decision Date: 20/05/2011

Property Address: First Floor Flat 344 City Road London EC1V 2PY

Report of the lease extension case Burchell v Raj Properties Limited, case reference LON/OOAU/OLR/2011/1088, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 20/05/2011. The case of Burchell v Raj Properties Limited involved the purchase of a new lease of a residential apartment in London under section 48 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Poscotis v Johary and Torabally

Type of Case: Lease Extension

Decision Date: 06/04/2011

Property Address: Ground Floor Flat 15 Nightingale Road London NW10 4RG

Report of the lease extension case Poscotis v Johary and Torabally, case reference LON/00AE/OLR/2010/1050, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 06/04/2011. The case of Poscotis v Johary and Torabally involved the purchase of a new lease of a residential apartment in London under section 48 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Felts, McInnes, McKay and Fraser v Sinclair Gardens (Investments) Kensington Limited

Type of Case: Lease Extension

Decision Date: 09/05/2011

Property Address: Flats 6, 17, 19, and 37 Minstrel Gardens Surbiton Surrey KT5 8DD

Report of the lease extension case Felts, McInnes, McKay and Fraser v Sinclair Gardens (Investments) Kensington Limited, case reference LON/OOAX/OLR/2010/1245, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 09/05/2011. The case of Felts, McInnes, McKay and Fraser v Sinclair Gardens (Investments) Kensington Limited involved the purchase of new leases of residential apartments in Surrey under section 48 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
The LVT Bulletin

Search

Use the following drop down menus to conduct your search. The search is conducted on an "AND" basis, so you can narrow your search by multiple criteria.

Use this box to search by keyword, incl. terms such as property address/postocde, or special case features such as garages, mobile phone masts, costs, car parking etc.

Report a case

Are we missing a case? Do you have a previously unreported case you would like to share on an anonymised basis? Want to suggest improvements? Please let us know by clicking here and reporting it to us.

Report a Case | Disclaimer