News On The Block

 
Home > Lvt

The LVT Bulletin

Decisions from the LVT and Higher Courts summarised and analysed for you 

The LVT Bulletin provides summaries and analysis of important landmark decisions from the LVT, First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and Higher Courts affecting  the residential leasehold property sector. It is a valuable resource for anyone involved in this industry. 

 

Hours of reading and time-consuming research are distilled into a convenient monthly digest with all the facts you need to know, and links to the full pdf decision where available. 

...the easiest way to keep informed about leasehold property case law

 

Key cases are carefully analysed and explained by our specialist legal research team from Arden Chambers and Tanfield Chambers so you can understand the developing law. 

You can view the full masthead by clicking here.

The LVT Bulletin is available only by subscription. Subscribe Now 
 

The LVT Bulletin is supported by:

         

 

Number of Results: 1860

Show All

Price and Turnbull v Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 06/04/2011

Property Address: Frist Floor Maisonette 34 Garnon Mead Epping Essex CM16 7RN

Report of the case Price and Turnbull v Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited, case reference CAM/22UH/OLR/2010/0100, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 06/04/2011. The case of Price and Turnbull v Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Terhoven v Woodhouse, Newton, Racey and Racey

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 28/04/2011

Property Address: Flat 1 The White House St Neots Road Eaton Socon St Neots Cambridgeshire PE19 7BE

Report of the case Terhoven v Woodhouse, Newton, Racey and Racey, case reference CAM/12UE/OLR/2011/0003, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 28/04/2011. The case of Terhoven v Woodhouse, Newton, Racey and Racey involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Nelken v Management Properties Ltd

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 03/05/2011

Property Address: Flat 1 45 Nassington Road London NW3 2TY

Report of the case Nelken v Management Properties Ltd, case reference CAM/00AG/OC9/2011/0001, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 03/05/2011. The case of Nelken v Management Properties Ltd involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Nash and Moon v Shepherd

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 30/06/2011

Property Address: Flats 7 & 8 105 Ashcroft Road Luton LU2 9AX

Report of the case Nash and Moon v Shepherd, case reference CAM/00KA/OLR/2011/0031, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 30/06/2011. The case of Nash and Moon v Shepherd involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd

Type of Case: Lease Extension

Decision Date: 09/10/2010

Property Address: 73 & 73A Ragstone Road Slough SL1 2NB

Report of the lease extension case Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd, case reference CAM/OOMD/OLR/2010/0079-0081, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 09/10/2010. The case of Kauser and Conway v Adealon International Corporation Proprietary Ltd involved the purchase of a new lease of a residential apartment in Slough under section 48 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 02/12/2010

Property Address: Flats 1 & 2 (and parking space) Ditton Lodge Ditton Court Road Westcliff-on-sea Essex SS0 7HG

Report of the case Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin, case reference CAM/00KF.OLR/2010/0059, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 02/12/2010. The case of Inkberrow Ltd v Tiffin and Tiffin involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 25/05/2011

Property Address: 3 Gladstone Court Fairfax Road London NW6 4EP

Report of the case Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate, case reference LON/00AG/OLR/2010/1065, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 25/05/2011. The case of Shemesh v The Trustees of the Eyre Estate involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 25/05/2011

Property Address: 6 Ribblesdale Road London N8 7EP

Report of the case Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited, case reference LON/00AP/OC9/2011/0020, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 25/05/2011. The case of Wallis and Blum v Buckford Estates Limited involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited

Type of Case: Enfranchisement

Decision Date: 23/05/2011

Property Address: 82 Portland Place London W1

Report of the enfranchisement case Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited, case reference PJ/LON/00BK/0CE/2010/0024, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 23/05/2011. The case of Howard de Walden Estates Limited v 82 Portland Place (Freehold) Limited involved the purchase of the freehold interest in a residential apartment in London under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.

Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton

Type of Case: Costs

Decision Date: 23/05/2011

Property Address: 23 Marmora Road London SE22 0RX

Report of the case Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton , case reference LON/00BE/OC9/2011/0017, decided in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal on 23/05/2011. The case of Buckford Estates Limited v Littleboy and Chilton involved determination of costs incurred in relation to an application under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.
The LVT Bulletin

Search

Use the following drop down menus to conduct your search. The search is conducted on an "AND" basis, so you can narrow your search by multiple criteria.

Use this box to search by keyword, incl. terms such as property address/postocde, or special case features such as garages, mobile phone masts, costs, car parking etc.

Report a case

Are we missing a case? Do you have a previously unreported case you would like to share on an anonymised basis? Want to suggest improvements? Please let us know by clicking here and reporting it to us.

Report a Case | Disclaimer