Fresh Appeal Threatens to Delay Leasehold Reform — Labour Urged to Stand Firm

It has now been 18 months since the LAFRA was passed in May 2024, but there has been limited progress.  In their ministerial statement last November, the Government promised steps to switch on the Act – including consulting on the rates which could make lease extensions cheaper or more expensive. 

The promises to implement the Act have not materialised, because the Government was cautiously waiting for the outcome of the High Court’s decision before progressing their agenda. 

The High Court’s ruling upheld the Act's legality and confirmed its compliance with human rights, and should be taken by the Government as a mandate to implement this legislation without further delay.
Linz Darlington states: "The sense of relief that the High Court ruled in favour of common sense is now being drowned out by a fresh wave of exasperation. We are now 18 months since this law hit the statute books, and leaseholders with leases below 80 years or a high ground rent are still no closer to being able to secure a lease extension that is cheaper or easier. Every single day of delay is a day that many can’t sell their properties, the value of their homes diminishes and the cost of extending a lease or buying their freehold increases." 

The appeal process is long, with estimates suggesting the Court of Appeal stage alone could take 18 months, followed by a further 18 months if the freeholders take their case to the Supreme Court. 

The final threat remains the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, a final delaying tactic should the freeholders lose at the UK’s highest level. 

“The High Court ruling was well reasoned and arguably leaves limited opportunity for a successful appeal – but even the delay caused by appeals will be a win for the freeholders. In the meantime, they will benefit from lease extension and freehold purchase premiums paid under the existing legislation.” 

"The Labour Government must now find the gumption to accept the High Court’s clear ruling and crack on with implementing the Act. They cannot stand by and allow the freeholders’ endless, expensive appeals—which are likely to fail—to hold the entire system to ransom. We are demanding they stop waiting for the outcome of appeal after appeal and immediately launch the valuation consultation and lay the necessary secondary legislation. Delaying implementation only serves the freeholders, not the people this Act was designed to protect."

Linz Darlington, MD and Founder, Homehold